Beijing time on July 30 before dawn message, this year June, committee of American international trade (the following abbreviation " ITC " ) rulingAppleresealable bagsThe company violates SamSung patent, prohibit IPhone of old money of part of malic company sale and IPad. The patent big fight of two companies escalates once more nowadays, force government o canon ef 15mm f abstruse Ba Ma to make resolution to the ban of ITC.
ITC is the important ruling orgnaization of company patent contentious case, this orgnaization has the jurisdiction of pair of unfair competition behavior, authority prohibits the entrance of the product and sell.
The patent litigation case of malic company and SamSung causes the intense discussion of people. Current, be in to software manufacturer from AT&T of mobile operation business try to affect Aobama of the government discuss.
Personage of know the inside story discloses, american judiciary and commission of American federal trade (the following abbreviation " FTC " ) antitrust official also shares balance this case. Last year, american judiciary and FTC ever expressed, the product that fears the company can use a few basic technology patent to prevent a competitor enters the market, this kind of behavior belongs to unfair competition.
To the government character, overrule ITC ban fact to belong to infrequent, the government vetoes ITC prohibition recently is 1987. If not Luo Man is hands-off this case, so most popular selling canon ef 15mm ban general on August 4 become effective. A spokesman represents office of American trade delegate, frohman is setting according the most popular memory laptop toshiba to law and equal opportunity principle spreads out discretion with respect to ITC ban and check honestly program, meet bring into each aspects that involve this case the consideration.
Controversy focus
modern dining chairsAt present the focus of controversy depends on, having patent company is to should authority prevents a competitor to sell a product through patent, still obtain money only compensation is sufficient. Generally speaking, if a company allows other to use its patent by occupation standard, so this company must contend for adversary accredit according to reasonable clause Xiang Jing this is patent. If do not have accredit, the company has authority Xiang Jing to contend for adversary to lodge a complaint.
According to the ban of ITC, malic company must stop to sell product of partial old money, include the IPhone that by mobile operation business T-Mobile and AT&T are in charge of selling to wait among them. Malic company shows, samSung not should can sell from what through ITC this ban prevents IPhone and IPad, the reason is SamSung affirmatory already, meeting protocol is reasonable patent of basic to its standard has the article accredit.
In a file that makes to Fuluomandi in malic company, if this ban is approved,this company shows, other company also can ask with banning the menace of carry out product the competitor pays exorbitant patent tax. Malic company still shows, the odds that the government vetoes this ITC prohibition is met at least and previously like overruling case tall. Outside the careful agenda foreword that removes government of abstruse Ba Ma, malic company still appeals in Xiang Lianbang court.
SamSung expresses, what cause this patent big fight the earliest is malic company, accordingly the company has no alternative, can seek only prohibit malic company sells afore-mentioned products. SamSung says in a referred document, it is malic company raises to SamSung above all patent lawsuit, subsequently use strategy escapes the patent accredit fee that should pay to SamSung originally.
ITC expresses, malic company fails to prove the patent accre the most popular canon ef 15mm dit clause of SamSung is unreasonable, company of Ju Ping fruit's located ground potential energy makes its more the patent that uses a competitor easily, and do not pay patent accredit fee. Malic company puts for scooby costume ward, usually ITC should not be in product prohibition is issued in involving the case with basic and patent standard. ITC rejected this one argument. usb harddrive enclosure
The government of United States of hope of a committee member of ITC at this point case undertake deliberative, think malic company should let American president know with respect to the argument of policy respect. Meanwhile, another committee member opposes product ban, say this will destroy market competition.
Industry point of view
After this the most popular t mobile prepaid cards case appears, the company of science and technology that already much home precedes indicated his position to ITC, United States Congress and government. Connect vice-president high to hold Murphy of • of counsel Xi En concurrently (Sean Murphy) expresses: "In Washington, always darkling of a lot of things undertakes. " connect high hearing that holds by senate of United States Congress will be attended in this week. Connect high have a lot of levels basic patent, it is innovation alliance (one of members of Innovation Alliance) .
spring pool
Innovation alliance is a trade organization that forms by company of science and technology, this organization is urging Frohman to approve this product that is aimed at malic company to ban carry out to make at present. Innovation alliance shows, if most popular selling t mobile prepaid cards government of abstruse Ba Ma vetoes this prohibition, will overturn tens of year the market expectation that will come down already firmly surely, and destroy patent execute the law.
Malic company cited in legal file the relevant opinion on public affairs of AT&T. AT&T points out, the ban of ITC can let consumer lose the chance that buys a very popular low IPhone, this and government popularize the target of broadband network to not agree with. AT&T spokesman rejects to be judged to this buy, also reject to publish the relevant document that the company submits.
The industry of the software such as the representing and chip manufacturer organizes BSA to also express, usually the product bans carry out to make should be not approved. The Mi Erji of • of chief attorney Lan Daoer that Verizon of business of American mobile operation corresponds (Randal Milch) also offers similar point of view.
Governmental position
President of all previous United States can is opposite rarely the ruling exercise veto of ITC, but because American government ever expressed to want to pay close attention to patent and competitive issue, this picket case times get attention. American judiciary and patent brand the most popular memory card digital cameras bureau ever published associated statement in January, say ITC is in when issueing the product prohibition related to basic patent, should take very cautious attitude.
American judiciary and ITC speech average per capita reject to be judged to this message buy.
American government ever suggested to congress, hope ITC can adjust judicatory level, make the company of hold patent wins product ban harder. The government puts forward this proposal and ITC to promulgate the product ban that is aimed at malic company to be in fitly same day. (Chen Ran)
